![\"\"](\"https:\/\/new.thepinetree.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/bZVNGko7_400x400.jpg\")
<\/a><\/p>\nThis one-notch downgrade on our 21-notch rating scale reflects the increase over more than a decade in government debt and interest payment ratios to levels that are significantly higher than similarly rated sovereigns.<\/p>\n
Successive US administrations and Congress have failed to agree on measures to reverse the trend of large annual fiscal deficits and growing interest costs. We do not believe that material multi-year reductions in mandatory spending and deficits will result from current fiscal proposals under consideration. Over the next decade, we expect larger deficits as entitlement spending rises while government revenue remains broadly flat. In turn, persistent, large fiscal deficits will drive the government’s debt and interest burden higher. The US’ fiscal performance is likely to deteriorate relative to its own past and compared to other highly-rated sovereigns.<\/p>\n
The stable outlook reflects balanced risks at Aa1. The US retains exceptional credit strengths such as the size, resilience and dynamism of its economy and the role of the US dollar as global reserve currency. In addition, while recent months have been characterized by a degree of policy uncertainty, we expect that the US will continue its long history of very effective monetary policy led by an independent Federal Reserve. The stable outlook also takes into account institutional features, including the constitutional separation of powers among the three branches of government that contributes to policy effectiveness over time and is relatively insensitive to events over a short period. While these institutional arrangements can be tested at times, we expect them to remain strong and resilient.<\/p>\n
The US’ long-term local- and foreign-currency country ceilings remain at Aaa. The Aaa local-currency ceiling reflects a small government footprint in the economy and extremely low risk of currency and balance of payment crises. The foreign-currency ceiling at Aaa reflects the country’s strong policy effectiveness and an open capital account, reducing transfer and convertibility risks.<\/p>\n
A full list of affected ratings is provided towards the end of this press release.<\/p>\n
RATINGS RATIONALE<\/p>\n
RATIONALE FOR THE RATINGS DOWNGRADE TO Aa1<\/p>\n
Over more than a decade, US federal debt has risen sharply due to continuous fiscal deficits. During that time, federal spending has increased while tax cuts have reduced government revenues. As deficits and debt have grown, and interest rates have risen, interest payments on government debt have increased markedly.<\/p>\n
Without adjustments to taxation and spending, we expect budget flexibility to remain limited, with mandatory spending, including interest expense, projected to rise to around 78% of total spending by 2035 from about 73% in 2024. If the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act is extended, which is our base case, it will add around $4 trillion to the federal fiscal primary (excluding interest payments) deficit over the next decade.<\/p>\n
As a result, we expect federal deficits to widen, reaching nearly 9% of GDP by 2035, up from 6.4% in 2024, driven mainly by increased interest payments on debt, \u00a0rising entitlement spending, and relatively low revenue generation. We anticipate that the federal debt burden will rise to about 134% of GDP by 2035, compared to 98% in 2024.<\/p>\n
Despite high demand for US Treasury assets, higher Treasury yields since 2021 have contributed to a decline in debt affordability. Federal interest payments are likely to absorb around 30% of revenue by 2035, up from about 18% in 2024 and 9% in 2021. \u00a0The US general government interest burden, which takes into account federal, state and local debt, absorbed 12% of revenue in 2024, compared to 1.6% for Aaa-rated sovereigns.<\/p>\n
While we recognize the US’ significant economic and financial strengths, we believe these no longer fully counterbalance the decline in fiscal metrics.<\/p>\n
RATIONALE FOR THE STABLE OUTLOOK<\/p>\n
The stable outlook reflects balanced risks at Aa1. A number of credit strengths offer resilience to shocks.<\/p>\n
The US economy is unique among the sovereigns we rate. It combines very large scale, high average incomes, strong growth potential and a track-record of innovation that supports productivity and GDP growth. While GDP growth is likely to slow in the short term as the economy adjusts to higher tariffs, we do not expect that the US’ long-term growth will be significantly affected.<\/p>\n
In addition, the US dollar’s status as the world’s dominant reserve currency provides significant credit support to the sovereign. The credit benefits of the dollar are wide-ranging and provide the extraordinary funding capacity that helps the government finance large annual fiscal deficits and refinance its large debt burden at moderate and relatively predictable costs. Despite reserve diversification by central banks globally over the past twenty years, we expect the US dollar to remain the dominant global reserve currency for the foreseeable future.<\/p>\n
Underpinning the rating is our assumption that the US’ institutions and governance will not materially weaken, even if they are tested at times. In particular, we assume that the long-standing checks and balances between the three branches of government and respect for the rule of law will remain broadly unchanged. In addition, we assess that the US has capacity to adjust its fiscal trajectory, even as policy decision-making evolves from one administration to the next.<\/p>\n
Moreover, the resilience of the US sovereign rating to shocks is supported by strong monetary and macroeconomic policy institutions. Although policy has been less predictable in recent months, relative to what has typically been the case in the US and other highly-rated sovereigns, we expect that monetary and macroeconomic policy effectiveness will remain very strong, preserving macroeconomic and financial stability through business cycles.<\/p>\n
SUMMARY OF MINUTES FROM RATING COMMITTEE<\/p>\n
GDP per capita (PPP basis, US$): \u00a085,812 (2024) \u00a0(also known as Per Capita Income)<\/p>\n
Real GDP growth (% change): \u00a02.8% (2024) \u00a0(also known as GDP Growth)<\/p>\n
Inflation Rate (CPI, % change Dec\/Dec): \u00a02.9% (2024)<\/p>\n
Gen. Gov. Financial Balance\/GDP: \u00a0-7.5% (2024) \u00a0(also known as Fiscal Balance)<\/p>\n
Current Account Balance\/GDP: \u00a0-3.9% (2024) \u00a0(also known as External Balance)<\/p>\n
External debt\/GDP: \u00a088.0% (2024)<\/p>\n
Economic resiliency: \u00a0aa1<\/p>\n
Default history: \u00a0No default events (on bonds or loans) have been recorded since 1983.<\/p>\n
A rating committee was called to discuss the rating of the United States of America, Government of. The main points raised during the discussion were: The issuer’s economic fundamentals, including its economic strength, have not materially changed. The issuer’s institutions and governance strength, have not materially changed. The issuer’s fiscal or financial strength, including its debt profile, has materially decreased. The issuer’s susceptibility to event risks has not materially changed.<\/p>\n
FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGS<\/p>\n
The implementation of fiscal reforms to significantly slow and eventually reverse the deterioration in debt affordability and fiscal deficits, either by materially increasing government revenues or reducing spending, could lead to an upgrade.<\/p>\n
A significantly faster and larger deterioration in fiscal metrics than we currently expect would weigh on the rating. \u00a0A rapid move out of dollar assets by global investors could precipitate such a deterioration if it resulted in much higher interest rates, causing the interest burden to rise faster than we currently expect. We do not consider this to be a likely scenario since a credible alternative to the US dollar as global reserve currency is not readily apparent.<\/p>\n
The rating also could be downgraded if policy effectiveness or the strength of institutions were to erode to such a degree that materially weakens the sovereign’s credit profile. This would be the case if it were to lead to a deterioration in medium-term growth or economic resilience to shocks, or if it was accompanied by a significant and lasting move by global investors out of the US dollar.<\/p>\n
LIST OF AFFECTED RATINGS<\/p>\n
..Issuer: United States of America, Government of<\/p>\n
Downgrades:<\/p>\n
…. LT Issuer Rating (Local currency), Downgraded to Aa1 from Aaa<\/p>\n
…. LT Issuer Rating (Foreign currency), Downgraded to Aa1 from Aaa<\/p>\n
…. Senior Unsecured (Local currency), Downgraded to Aa1 from Aaa<\/p>\n
Outlook Actions:<\/p>\n
….Outlook, Changed to Stable from Negative<\/p>\n
The principal methodology used in these ratings was Sovereigns published in November 2022 and available at\u00a0https:\/\/ratings.moodys.com\/rmc-documents\/395819<\/span><\/a>. Alternatively, please see the Rating Methodologies page on\u00a0https:\/\/ratings.moodys.com<\/span><\/a>\u00a0for a copy of this methodology.<\/p>\n The weighting of all rating factors is described in the methodology used in this credit rating action, if applicable.<\/p>\n The net effect of any adjustments applied to rating factor scores or scorecard outputs under the primary methodology(ies), if any, was not material to the ratings addressed in this announcement.<\/p>\n REGULATORY DISCLOSURES<\/p>\n For further specification of Moody’s key rating assumptions and sensitivity analysis, see the sections Methodology Assumptions and Sensitivity to Assumptions in the disclosure form. Moody’s Rating Symbols and Definitions can be found on\u00a0https:\/\/ratings.moodys.com\/rating-definitions<\/span><\/a>.<\/p>\n For any affected securities or rated entities receiving direct credit support\/credit substitution from another entity or entities subject to a credit rating action (the supporting entity), and whose ratings may change as a result of a credit rating action as to the supporting entity, the associated regulatory disclosures will relate to the supporting entity. Exceptions to this approach may be applicable in certain jurisdictions.<\/p>\n For ratings issued on a program, series, category\/class of debt or security, certain regulatory disclosures applicable to each rating of a subsequently issued bond or note of the same series, category\/class of debt, or security, or pursuant to a program for which the ratings are derived exclusively from existing ratings, in accordance with Moody’s rating practices, can be found in the most recent Credit Rating Announcement related to the same class of Credit Rating.<\/p>\n For provisional ratings, the Credit Rating Announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to the provisional rating assigned, and in relation to a definitive rating that may be assigned subsequent to the final issuance of the debt, in each case where the transaction structure and terms have not changed prior to the assignment of the definitive rating in a manner that would have affected the rating.<\/p>\n Moody’s does not always publish a separate Credit Rating Announcement for each Credit Rating assigned in the Anticipated Ratings Process or Subsequent Ratings Process.<\/p>\n These ratings are solicited. Please refer to Moody’s Policy for Designating and Assigning Unsolicited Credit Ratings available on its website\u00a0https:\/\/ratings.moodys.com<\/span><\/a>.<\/p>\n Regulatory disclosures contained in this press release apply to the credit rating and, if applicable, the related rating outlook or rating review.<\/p>\n The Global Scale Credit Rating(s) discussed in this Credit Rating Announcement was(were) issued by one of Moody’s affiliates outside the EU and UK and is(are) endorsed for use in the EU and UK in accordance with the EU and UK CRA Regulation.<\/p>\n